- Nov 17, 2021
-
-
Lyude Paul authored
Hooray! We've managed to hit enough bugs upstream that I've been able to come up with a pretty solid explanation for how backlight controls are actually supposed to be detected and used these days. As well, having the rest of the PWM bits in VESA's backlight interface implemented seems to have fixed all of the problematic brightness controls laptop panels that we've hit so far. So, let's actually document this instead of just calling the laptop panels liars. As well, I would like to formally apologize to all of the laptop panels I called liars. I'm sorry laptop panels, hopefully you can all forgive me and we can move past this~ Signed-off-by:
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-6-lyude@redhat.com
-
Lyude Paul authored
Now that we've added support to i915 for controlling panel backlights that need PWM to be enabled/disabled, let's finalize this and add support for controlling brightness levels via PWM as well. This should hopefully put us towards the path of supporting _ALL_ backlights via VESA's DPCD interface which would allow us to finally start trusting the DPCD again. Note however that we still don't enable using this by default on i915 when it's not needed, primarily because I haven't yet had a chance to confirm if it's safe to do this on the one machine in Intel's CI that had an issue with this: samus-fi-bdw. I have done basic testing of this on other machines though, by manually patching i915 to force it into PWM-only mode on some of my laptops. v2: * Correct documentation (thanks Doug!) * Get rid of backlight caps Signed-off-by:
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Cc: Satadru Pramanik <satadru@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-5-lyude@redhat.com
-
Lyude Paul authored
As it turns out, apparently some machines will actually leave additional backlight functionality like dynamic backlight control on before the OS loads. Currently we don't take care to disable unsupported features when writing back the backlight mode, which can lead to some rather strange looking behavior when adjusting the backlight. So, let's fix this by just not reading back the current backlight mode on initial enable. I don't think there should really be any downsides to this, and this will ensure we don't leave any unsupported functionality enabled. This should fix at least one (but not all) of the issues seen with DPCD backlight support on fi-bdw-samus v5: * Just avoid reading back DPCD register - Doug Anderson Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Since we don't support hybrid AUX/PWM backlights in nouveau right now, let's add some explicit checks so that we don't break nouveau once we enable support for these backlights in other drivers. Reviewed-by:
Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface. We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights that were broken by not having this enabled. For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may change in the future. v4: * Make sure that we call intel_backlight_level_to_pwm() in intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight() - vsyrjala Signed-off-by:
-
Kieran Bingham authored
The edp_panel_entry members 'delay' and 'name' are documented, but without the correct syntax for kernel doc. This generates the following warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c:204: warning: Function parameter or member 'delay' not described in 'edp_panel_entry' drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c:204: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'edp_panel_entry' Fix them accordingly. Fixes: 5540cf8f ("drm/panel-edp: Implement generic "edp-panel"s probed by EDID") Signed-off-by:
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by:
-
yangcong authored
Through log and waveform, we can see that there will be additional suspend/resume when booting. This timing does not meet the ps8640 spec. It seems that the delay of 500ms does not satisfied drm_panel_get_modes. I increased it to 900ms and it seems that this problem can be solved. To be safe, I'd just round up to a full 1000. Signed-off-by:
yangcong <yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by:
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Christian König authored
Heureka, that's finally not used any more. Signed-off-by:
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210917123513.1106-27-christian.koenig@amd.com
-
Christian König authored
Just grab all fences for the display flip in one go. Signed-off-by:
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211028132630.2330-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
-
Christian König authored
Simplifying the code a bit. Signed-off-by:
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211116102431.198905-7-christian.koenig@amd.com
-
Maarten Lankhorst authored
The i915_request fence wait behaves differently for timeout = 0 compared to expected dma-fence behavior. i915 behavior: - Unsignaled: -ETIME - Signaled: 0 (= timeout) Expected: - Unsignaled: 0 - Signaled: 1 Signed-off-by:
-
Christian König authored
Simplifying the code a bit. v2: rebased Signed-off-by:
-
Christian König authored
Simplifying the code a bit. v2: use dma_resv_for_each_fence instead, according to Tvrtko the lock is held here anyway. v3: back to using dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked. Signed-off-by: -
Christian König authored
Simplifying the code a bit. Signed-off-by:
-
Christian König authored
This makes the function much simpler since the complex retry logic is now handled else where. Signed-off-by:
-
- Nov 15, 2021
-
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
Change all GEM SHMEM object functions that receive a GEM object of type struct drm_gem_object to expect an object of type struct drm_gem_shmem_object instead. This change reduces the number of upcasts from struct drm_gem_object by moving them into callers. The C compiler can now verify that the GEM SHMEM functions are called with the correct type. For consistency, the patch also renames drm_gem_shmem_free_object to drm_gem_shmem_free. It further updates documentation for a number of functions. v3: * fix docs for drm_gem_shmem_object_free() v2: * mention _object_ callbacks in docs (Daniel) Signed-off-by:
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Acked-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
Wrap GEM SHMEM functions for struct drm_gem_object_funcs and update all callers. This will allow for an update of the public interfaces of the GEM SHMEM helper library. v2: * fix docs for drm_gem_shmem_object_print_info() Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
Turn drm_gem_shmem_create_with_handle() into an internal helper function. It's not used outside of the compilation unit. Signed-off-by:
-
- Nov 12, 2021
-
-
Hans Verkuil authored
The nouveau driver outputs full range RGB, but the AVI InfoFrame just says 'Default' instead of 'Full'. Call drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_quant_range to fill in the quantization field of the AVI InfoFrame correctly. Now displays that advertise RGB Selectable Quantization Range in their EDID will understand that full range is transmitted by the HDMI output. This is consistent to how the Nvidia's driver behaves. Signed-off-by:
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Reviewed-by:
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Luo Jiaxing authored
nouveau_framebuffer_new() call drm_format_info_plane_width() to get a width of plane, but width is not used then, so it's a useless function call here. Signed-off-by:
Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Luo Jiaxing authored
Fixes the following warning when using W=1 to build kernel: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function ‘nv50_mstm_cleanup’: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1389:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 1389 | int ret; | ^~~ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function ‘nv50_mstm_prepare’: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1413:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 1413 | int ret; | ^~~ Signed-off-by: -
Jiapeng Chong authored
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/tu102.c:53:1: warning: symbol 'tu102_fifo_runlist' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/headc57d.c:173:1: warning: no previous prototype for ‘headc57d_olut’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by:
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Luo Jiaxing authored
Following warning is found when using W=1 to build kernel: In function ‘nvkm_udevice_info’, inlined from ‘nvkm_udevice_mthd’ at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/user.c:195:10: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/user.c:164:2: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 16 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation] 164 | strncpy(args->v0.chip, device->chip->name, sizeof(args->v0.chip)); drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/user.c:165:2: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 64 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation] 165 | strncpy(args->v0.name, device->name, sizeof(args->v0.name)); The reason of this warning is strncpy() does not guarantee that the destination buffer will be NUL terminated. If the length of source string is bigger than number we set by third input parameter, only a part of characters is copied to the destination, and no NUL-terminated string is automatically added. There are some potential risks. So use snprintf() to replace strncpy(). Signed-off-by: -
Ilia Mirkin authored
The struct is giant, and triggers an order-7 allocation (512K). There is no reason for this to be kmalloc-type memory, so switch to vmalloc. This should help loading nouveau on low-memory and/or long-running systems. Reported-by:
Nathan E. Egge <unlord@xiph.org> Signed-off-by:
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
tangchunyou authored
disable,delete disable and return 0 Signed-off-by:
tangchunyou <tangchunyou@yulong.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
When it comes to gamma or degamma luts, nouveau will actually skip the calculation of certain LUTs depending on the head and plane states. For instance, when the head is disabled we don't perform any error checking on the gamma LUT, and likewise if no planes are present and enabled in our atomic state we will skip error checking the degamma LUT. This is a bit of a problem though, since the per-head gamma and degamma props in DRM can be changed even while a head is disabled - a situation which can be triggered by the igt testcase mentioned down below. Originally I thought this was a bit silly and was tempted to just fix the igt test to only set gamma/degamma with the head enabled. After a bit of thinking though I realized we should fix this in nouveau. This is because if a program decides to set an invalid LUT for a head before enabling the head, such a property change would succeed while also making it impossible to turn the head back on until the LUT is removed or corrected - something that could be painful for a user to figure out. So, fix this checking both degamma and gamma LUTs unconditionally during atomic checks. We start by calling nv50_head_atomic_check_lut() regardless of whether the head is active or not in nv50_head_atomic_check(). Then we move the ilut error checking into nv50_head_atomic_check_lut() and add a per-head hook for it, primarily because as a per-CRTC property DRM we want the LUT to be error checked by the head any time it's included in an atomic state. Of course though, actual programming of the degamma lut to hardware is still handled in each plane's atomic check and commit. Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Since this is used in the atomic check, we should use the right debug macro for it. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiapeng Chong authored
Fix the following coccicheck warnings: ./drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c:2048:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 2061. Reported-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Found this while trying to make some changes to the kms_cursor_crc test. curs507a_acquire checks that the width and height of the cursor framebuffer are equal (asyw->image.{w,h}). This isn't entirely correct though, as the height of the cursor can be larger than the size of the cursor, as long as the width is the same as the cursor size and there's no framebuffer offset. Note that I'm not entirely sure why this wasn't previously breaking kms_cursor_crc tests - they all set up cursors with the height being one pixel larger than the actual size of the cursor. But this seems to fix things, and the code before was definitely incorrect - so it's not really worth looking into further imho. Changes since v1: * Don't use crtc_w everywhere for determining cursor layout, just use fb size again * Change check so that we only check that the w/h of the cursor plane is the same, the width of the scanout surface is the same as the framebuffer width, and that there's no offset being used for the cursor surface. Signed-off-by: -
Bhaskar Chowdhury authored
s/conditon/condition/ Signed-off-by:
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Zou Wei authored
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/client.c:64:1: warning: symbol 'nvkm_uclient_sclass' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by:
Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Ben Skeggs authored
There have been reports of the WFI timing out on some boards, and a patch was proposed to just remove it. This stuff is rather fragile, and I believe the WFI might be needed with our FW prior to GM200. However, we probably should not be touching PMU during init on GPUs where we depend on NVIDIA FW, outside of limited circumstances, so this should be a somewhat safer change that achieves the desired result. Reported-by:
Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Noticed this while trying to figure out the bit that we need to set in order to get cursor CRCs to come up correctly on volta+: we never actually went and added these methods to gv100_disp_core_mthd_head in drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c which means we don't trace their values when disp tracing is enabled in nvkm. So, fix that. Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Something that didn't get noticed until I started running cursor tests: we're accidentally disabling an option for CRC calculation that's enabled by default: WidePipeCrc, which controls whether we use the full width of the data in the display pipe in order calculate CRCs. Having this disabled apparently causes frames with the cursor plane enabled to generate different CRCs than frames without the cursor plane enabled, even if the frames are pixel-equivalent. So, let's make sure to enable this and fix a bunch of cursor related tests in IGT. v2: * Nvidia added the specific bit we were using to fix this issues to open-gpu-docs, so pull in the actual macro definitions for it Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Originally it was assumed based on Nvidia's open-gpu-docs and testing that NVDisplay required that at least one wndw which belongs to a given head to be used as the controlling channel (NVC37D_HEAD_SET_CRC_CONTROL_CONTROLLING_CHANNEL) in order for CRC capture to function. While this is the case on Volta, Turing actually adds the ability to instead use the core channel as the controlling channel. For Turing this is quite useful, as it means that we can always default to the core channel as the controlling channel and we don't need to be concerned about ensuring we have at least one wndw channel owned by a head with CRC output enabled. While Volta lacks this ability, Volta conveniently also lacks flexible wndw mapping - meaning that we can always rely on each head having four wndw channels mapped to it regardless of the atomic state. So, simply use the hard-coded wndw mappings we're guaranteed to have on Volta as the controlling channel, and use the core channel as the controlling channel for Turing+. As a result this also renders the plane ownership logic in nv50_crc_atomic_check() unnessecary, which gives us one less thing to implement when we get support for flexible wndw mapping. We also can entirely drop the wndw parameter from our set_src callbacks, and the atomic state. v2 (Karol): put prackets around complex macro definition removed spaces before :32 in structs Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by: -
Lyude Paul authored
While I haven't seen us take too long in nv50_crc_ctx_flip_work() outside of users with kernel logging on a serial port, it probably would be a good idea to check how long we take just in case we need to go faster in the future. Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
Lyude Paul authored
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com> Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by:
Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Signed-off-by:
-
Karol Herbst authored
Some side notes on this. Atm we do want to use gitlab for bug tracking and merge requests. But due to the nature of the current linux kernel development, we can only do so for nouveau internal changes. Everything else still needs to be sent as emails and this is also includes changes to UAPI etc. Anyway, if somebody wants to submit patches via gitlab, they are free to do so and this should just make this more official and documented. People listed as maintainers are such that have push access to drm-misc (where changes are pushed to after landing in gitlab) and are known nouveau developers. We did this already for some trivial changes and critical bug fixes already, we just weren't thinking about updating the MAINTAINERS file. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by:
-
