signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)
Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is wanted. So change every instance we can to make the code clearer. Acked-by:Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133 Signed-off-by:
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Showing
- arch/arc/kernel/process.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/arc/kernel/process.c
- arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/m68k/kernel/traps.c
- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c
- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c 2 additions, 2 deletionsarch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
- arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/s390/kernel/traps.c
- arch/um/kernel/trap.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/um/kernel/trap.c
- arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c 1 addition, 1 deletionarch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
- fs/exec.c 1 addition, 1 deletionfs/exec.c
Please register or sign in to comment