- Dec 16, 2021
-
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Some files have been flagged with the new LGPL-2.1-or-later identifier which replace the original LGPL-2.1+ in the SPDX license identifier specification, but the identifiers are not mentioned as valid in the LGPL-2.1 license file. Add it, together with the LGPL-2.1-only at the the license file. Signed-off-by:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/12f38ebde4dcd8b1ecbd37df1b6ce2018426f6dd.1639657049.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- Jul 15, 2021
-
-
Nishanth Menon authored
A couple of exotic quote characters came in with this license text; they can confuse software that is not expecting non-ASCII text. Switch to normal quotes here, with no changes to the actual license text. Reported-by:
Rahul T R <r-ravikumar@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by:
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> Acked-by:
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210703012931.30604-1-nm@ti.com Signed-off-by:
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- Dec 08, 2020
-
-
Thorsten Leemhuis authored
Add the full text of the CC-BY-4.0 license to the kernel tree as well as the required tags for reference and tooling. The license text was copied directly from the following url, but for clarification a 'Creative Commons' was added before 'Attribution 4.0 International' in the first line: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.txt CC-BY-4.0 is GPLv2 compatible, but when for example used for the kernel's documentation it can easily happen that sphinx during processing combines it with text or code from files using a more restrictive license[1]. This bears pitfalls, hence point that risk out and suggest to only use this license in combination with the GPLv2. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201201144314.GA14256@lst.de Signed-off-by:
-
- Sep 16, 2020
-
-
Mikhail Zaslonko authored
The new files contributed to zlib have Zlib SPDX license identifier. Since there was no Zlib license text in LICENSES, scripts/spdxcheck.py reported the following errors: lib/zlib_dfltcc/dfltcc.c: 1:28 Invalid License ID: Zlib lib/zlib_dfltcc/dfltcc.h: 1:28 Invalid License ID: Zlib lib/zlib_dfltcc/dfltcc_deflate.c: 1:28 Invalid License ID: Zlib lib/zlib_dfltcc/dfltcc_inflate.c: 1:28 Invalid License ID: Zlib lib/zlib_dfltcc/dfltcc_util.h: 1:28 Invalid License ID: Zlib The patch adds Zlib SPDX license to LICENSES/deprecated, thus resolving the issues reported by spdxcheck. Suggested-by:
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
There are some files under Documentation which uses deprecated versions of GNU Free Documentation License, on both versions 1.1 and 1.2. On all cases, the license is with no Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts. Add the text file for them, as we'll start using SPDX for those. Signed-off-by:
-
- May 03, 2019
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Make it clear in the directory name that these are not intended for new code. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Just like the CDDL the Apache license and the MPL must only be used as a choice in additional to an GPL2 compatible license. Copy over the boilerplate from the CDDL file to the other two after fixing it up to make it clear the licenses need to be GPL2 compatible, not just the more generic GPL compatible. For example the Apache 2 license is GPL3 compatible, but that doesn't matter for the kernel. Also move these licenses to a separate directory and document the rules in license-rules.rst. Signed-off-by:
-
- Jan 16, 2019
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
A recent commit added SPDX identifiers to the SuperH low level library code which originates from GCC. This code is licensed under the GPL 2.0 or later with the GCC runtime library exception. Unfortunately the authors did not bother to add the exception text to the LICENSES directory so spdxcheck fails with: arch/sh/lib/ashiftrt.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/ashlsi3.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/ashrsi3.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/lshrsi3.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/movmem.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/udiv_qrnnd.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/udivsi3.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/udivsi3_i4i-Os.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 arch/sh/lib/udivsi3_i4i.S: 1:42 Invalid Exception ID: GCC-exception-2.0 Add the exception text ...
-
- Oct 18, 2018
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Using non-GPL licenses for our documentation is rather problematic, as it can directly include other files, which generally are GPLv2 licensed and thus not compatible. Remove this license now that the only user (idr.rst) is gone to avoid people semi-accidentally using it again. Signed-off-by:
-
- Oct 12, 2018
-
-
Hans de Goede authored
Add the full text of the ISC license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/ISC.html With the mention of "ISC" in the warranty disclaimer replaced with "THE AUTHOR" as done in the ISC license headers used in the ath10k and brcmfmac wifi drivers. Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by:
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hans de Goede authored
The only reason we have the CDDL-1.0 license text around is for some dual-licensed files from virtualbox. New code should not use this license. Add a note about this and change the example tag to be dual-licensed. Signed-off-by:
-
- Apr 27, 2018
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
The infiniband code uses a variant of the OpenIB license. This license is BSD-2-Clause with the MIT disclaimer. The linux kernel uses this license extensively throughout the driver subsystem since 2005. Note that the OpenIB.org license is a true match to BSD-2-Clause. The license text was copied from: https://spdx.org/licenses/Linux-OpenIB.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the CDDL-1.0 to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the Apache License version 2 to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/Apache-2.0.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the X11 to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Quite some files have been flagged with the new GPL-2.0-only and GPL-2.0-or-later identifiers which replace the original GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ identifiers in the SPDX license identifier specification, but the identifiers are not mentioned as valid in the GPL-2.0 license file. Add them to the license file and to the Linux-syscall-note exception to make everything consistent again. Signed-off-by:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Jan 06, 2018
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the Mozilla Public License 1.1 to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/MPL-1.1.html#licenseText Signed-off-by:Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the GPL 1.0 license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-1.0.html#licenseText Signed-off-by: -
Thomas Gleixner authored
Copied from the Linux kernel COPYING file. Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the MIT license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html#licenseText Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the BSD 3-clause "Clear" License to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Clear.html Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html#licenseText Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the BSD 2-clause "Simplified" license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html#licenseText Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the LGPL 2.1 license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1.html#licenseText Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the LGPL 2.0 license to the kernel tree. It was copied directly from: https://spdx.org/licenses/LGPL-2.0.html#licenseText Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Add the full text of the GPL 2.0 license to the LICENSES directory. It was copied directly from the COPYING file in the kernel source tree as it differs from the public available version of the license in various places including the FSF. Philippe did some research on the GPL2.0 history: There is NO trustworthy version of an official GPL 2.0 text: the FSF official texts are all fubar (if only in small and subtle ways). The FSF texts should be authoritative, but then which one? They published more GPL 2.0 versions than most. So we would be hard pressed to blame SPDX or the OSI for having their own minor variant. Then in digging further, I found the ONE true original GPL with a file time stamp on June 2 1991, 01:50 (AM?, PM? unknown time zone?) ! in an old GCC archive. For the posterity and everyone's enjoyment I have built a git history of GPL 2.0 Mark1 to Mark6 See https://github.com/pombredanne/gpl-history/commits/master/COPYING I also added a shorter history of the Linux COPYING text. The first version in Linus's git tree is based on the very fine and well tuned GPL 2 Mark4, the first fully Y2K compliant version of the GPL 2, as you can see from the diffs with the former Mark3: that was dangerously stuck in the last century. The current version in is based on a rare GPL 2.0 Mark5.1 aka "Franklin St", that I do not have in my history yet and spells "Franklin St." rather than "Franklin Street." Therefore there is likely another GPL 2.0 version between Mark4 and Mark5 that I have yet to find and may not have been caught by the archive.org spiders. Here help and patches welcomed: this is likely an important missing link. Further information about this archaelogical research; http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAOFm3uEzRMf261+O-Nm+9HDoEn9RbFjH=5J9i1C2GgMUg2G4LA@mail.gmail.com Add the required tags for reference and tooling. Signed-off-by:
Jonas Oberg <jonas@fsfe.org> Reviewed-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
